ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

ETZ(including Kanuni), ETS, ES, TS, IFA-RT, BK, Saxon,

Moderators: DAVID THOMPSON, phlat65

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby Puffs » Tue Oct 01, 2019 5:57 am

Following a biased and flawed moderator choice (someone posting aggressive personal attacks is rewarded, while my technical posts are removed - behind my back & without any justification!), I have withdrawn from this forum.
Last edited by Puffs on Mon Apr 03, 2023 8:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Puffs
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby Puffs » Wed Oct 02, 2019 4:48 am

Following a biased and flawed moderator choice (someone posting aggressive personal attacks is rewarded, while my technical posts are removed - behind my back & without any justification!), I have withdrawn from this forum.
Last edited by Puffs on Mon Apr 03, 2023 8:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Puffs
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby dave47 » Thu Oct 03, 2019 11:40 am

The correct squish for the ETZ250 is 0.9-1.2mm, and I daresay it is similar for the 251.
My own (251) squish is 1.1mm with 0.6 mm of head gasket, so if I used a 0.2mm gasket it would be safe to add an extra 0.5mm at the base, ie same as you have done. I will certainly try this out next time I have the barrel off. Unless of course you report in the meantime that it made no difference!
dave47
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:56 am

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby Puffs » Thu Oct 03, 2019 12:18 pm

Following a biased and flawed moderator choice (someone posting aggressive personal attacks is rewarded, while my technical posts are removed - behind my back & without any justification!), I have withdrawn from this forum.
Last edited by Puffs on Mon Apr 03, 2023 8:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Puffs
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby dave47 » Mon Oct 07, 2019 9:30 am

I will definitely do that then, it is worth it even if it increases low end a little bit.

Regarding your 1.3mm squish:
It seems to me that because you have had a rebore, even if it is just 1st o/s, it will increase the cylinder volume by enough to keep the compression ratio right, even though the squish is 0.1mm above tolerance. I am no technical expert, however!
dave47
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:56 am

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby parrbd » Tue Oct 08, 2019 1:42 am

Too large a squish clearance can encourage detonation. Best to keep within specification.
parrbd
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:06 am
Location: Bundanoon, NSW

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby Puffs » Tue Oct 08, 2019 8:53 am

Following a biased and flawed moderator choice (someone posting aggressive personal attacks is rewarded, while my technical posts are removed - behind my back & without any justification!), I have withdrawn from this forum.
Last edited by Puffs on Mon Apr 03, 2023 8:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Puffs
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby parrbd » Tue Oct 08, 2019 4:29 pm

Too small a squish clearance may cause clearance problems but it will reduce detonation. Too large a clearance will make detonation more likely. Refer to page 37 in the Jennings bible. http://www.amrca.com/tech/tuners.pdf
parrbd
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:06 am
Location: Bundanoon, NSW

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby Puffs » Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:13 am

Following a biased and flawed moderator choice (someone posting aggressive personal attacks is rewarded, while my technical posts are removed - behind my back & without any justification!), I have withdrawn from this forum.
Last edited by Puffs on Mon Apr 03, 2023 8:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Puffs
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby parrbd » Thu Oct 10, 2019 4:41 am

I think my reading of this research is that the squish area stops ignition of the enclosed mixture because too much heat is lost to the surrounding metal. This only works within a small range and the ideal was tested as .015". What I am inferring is that as the clearance increases it stops acting as a squish area and ignition can occur at the outer reaches of the combustion chamber, so bringing back the possibility of detonation. BTW, from experience I have had results that diverged from Jennings advice, particularly with inlet timing. (On a TZ350A I got a much more tractable engine after taking 5mm off the rear skirt and a better top end of 154mph at Bathurst, back in 1975)
parrbd
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:06 am
Location: Bundanoon, NSW

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby Puffs » Thu Oct 10, 2019 5:17 am

Following a biased and flawed moderator choice (someone posting aggressive personal attacks is rewarded, while my technical posts are removed - behind my back & without any justification!), I have withdrawn from this forum.
Last edited by Puffs on Mon Apr 03, 2023 8:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Puffs
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby Puffs » Sun Oct 20, 2019 4:53 am

Following a biased and flawed moderator choice (someone posting aggressive personal attacks is rewarded, while my technical posts are removed - behind my back & without any justification!), I have withdrawn from this forum.
Last edited by Puffs on Mon Apr 03, 2023 8:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Puffs
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby Puffs » Fri Oct 25, 2019 6:15 am

Following a biased and flawed moderator choice (someone posting aggressive personal attacks is rewarded, while my technical posts are removed - behind my back & without any justification!), I have withdrawn from this forum.
Last edited by Puffs on Mon Apr 03, 2023 8:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Puffs
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:20 am
Location: Ardennes, Belgium.

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby dave47 » Sun Oct 27, 2019 7:04 am

Thats a very professional looking job.
dave47
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:56 am

Re: ETZ 250 - 251 diffrences

Postby JawasandMZs » Wed Nov 11, 2020 9:38 am

I remember when the 251 was introduced and the bike press evaluation was that the 250 etz had hotted up the porting from the Supa 5 making it a (relatively) peaky, fast stroker at the expense of sub 50mpg economy. The 251 reversed this design by making the motor much more flexible sub 3,500 rpm, the point below which the etz 250 is pretty hopeless in 5th gear, resulting in better economy but probably less fun to ride.
JawasandMZs
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2020 12:30 pm

Previous

Return to Vintage Motorcycles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests